REAL ESTATE UPDATE - SPRING 2008  VIEW FULL NEWSLETTER
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP - Attorneys at Law

REAL ESTATE UPDATE

SPRING 2008 


 Print-friendly versionMobile and Print-friendly version


ATLANTIC YARDS - PUBLIC TAKING OR PRETEXT?


EmpireState02.jpgThe Atlantic Yards Arena and Redevelopment Project in Brooklyn overcame a legal challenge on February 1, 2008, in the case of Goldstein v. Pataki, decided by the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The plaintiffs-appellants, fifteen property owners whose homes and  businesses are slated for condemnation to make way for the project, sought to block its construction. They argued that the condemnation or "taking" of the private property of existing home and business owners to assemble the large swath of land required by the project violates the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, which reads, in part, "Private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation." Read More

YOU SCRATCH MY BACK, AND I'LL SCRATCH YOURS


Can tenants occupying a rent-stabilized apartment as their non-primary residence agree to pay rent higher than the legally prescribed rent for such apartment in return for which their landlord would agree not to pursue an eviction action on the grounds that the apartment is not the tenants' primary residence?

 

On February 7, 2008, the New York Court of Appeals decided the case of Riverside Syndicate, Inc. v. Munroe et al. A couple had subleased a rent-stabilized apartment on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. After the landlord, claiming that the sublease was illegal, sued to evict them, the case was settled in 1996 according to a court-approved stipulation between the landlord and the couple that covered one apartment created by the combination

of the contested apartment with two other rent-stabilized apartments, with the couple now as the direct tenants of

the combined apartment. Read More

LLC DERIVATIVE SUITS - NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS MOVES THE LAW CLOSER TO DELAWARE

 

If the members of a limited liability company (LLC) formed in New York believe that the managers of the LLC have injured the LLC, can they bring a suit against the managers? Although a line of rulings has found that  members can bring direct claims against the managers of an LLC whereby they allege that they as members have been injured by the actions of the managers, the various New York lower courts have been split on the issue of derivative suits, in which the members of the LLC bring the claims not on behalf of themselves, but on behalf of the LLC itself. The damages in a successful derivative suit would be awarded to the LLC and not to the individual members. Read More

DOWNLOADS
080429 Real Estate Newsletter.pdf (835.42 kb)
This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such.
© 2008 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Robert S. Strauss Building
1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036

IRS Circular 230 Notice Requirement: This communication is not given in the form of a covered opinion, within the meaning of Circular 230 issued by the United States Secretary of the Treasury. Thus, we are required to inform you that you cannot rely upon any tax advice contained in this communication for the purpose of avoiding United States federal tax penalties. In addition, any tax advice contained in this communication may not be used to promote, market or recommend a transaction to another party.


To opt out from future communications please visit:
http://akingumpinfo.com/vtu/a70SZZCsW3164j